Pilot study of an adult bowel management program for fecal incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: Bowel management programs are efficacious in pediatric patients with fecal incontinence or intractable constipation unresponsive to standard treatment. No studies have been done examining outcomes in adults. The objective of this study was to assess continence and quality of life outcomes in adults who have underwent bowel management program. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients 16 or older at the time they underwent a bowel management program for fecal incontinence or constipation was performed. Data collected included intake and follow-up stool and urinary continence, patient-reported outcomes measures (Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score, Baylor Continence Scale, Vancouver Symptom Score for Dysfunctional Elimination), and an age-adjusted health-related quality of life measure. RESULTS: The cohort included 38 patients with a median age of 19 years (range: 16-55) when they underwent our program. 50% of patients were female and the majority (33, 87%) were White. The most common diagnosis was anorectal malformation (16, 42%) followed by functional constipation (10, 27%). Stool continence rates improved after undergoing the program (52.7% prior to 87.6% at follow-up, p<0.01). There was significant improvement in the Baylor Continence Scale, Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score, and PedsQL (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients who underwent a bowel management program for severe fecal incontinence or constipation show significant improvement in stool continence rates, patient-reported outcomes measures, and quality of life. A bowel management program (in-person or via telemedicine) is a feasible treatment strategy for adult patients who fail standard management of fecal incontinence or constipation and should be offered when appropriate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Both sides of the screen: Provider and patient perspective on telemedicine in pediatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: There has been increased telemedicine use secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of this study was to assess patient/parent satisfaction with their telemedicine experience, gauge provider perspective on telemedicine for the management of pediatric colorectal disease and evaluate the quality of telemedicine care being provided. METHODS: A cross sectional study was performed at a single institution from March 2020-February 2021. Patients who completed a patient/parent telemedicine survey after a telemedicine appointment and nurse practitioners/surgeons who completed a provider telemedicine survey were included. Patient and provider characteristics and responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Differences between the levels of provider confidence to provide telemedicine care were analyzed using Pearson's chi-square test. RESULTS: 118 patients/parents completed the survey. The median age of patients was 7 years. Most patients were male (59%) and White (73%). The most common diagnosis was anorectal malformation (49%). 71% of parents felt the telemedicine visit was as effective or better than an in-person visit and over 70% said they prefer a telemedicine visit to an in-person visit. Ten surgeons and 8 nurse practitioners completed the provider survey. 28% had previous telemedicine experience and 94% planned to continue offering telemedicine appointments. Providers felt significantly more confident performing clinical duties via video telemedicine compared to telephone telemedicine. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine is a useful adjunct or alternative in pediatric surgery for complex patients who require multidisciplinary care. Providers show confidence with the use of video telemedicine and parents show high satisfaction, with the majority preferring telemedicine visits over in-person visits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Outcomes of a telemedicine bowel management program during COVID-19.

PURPOSE: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we transitioned from an in-person bowel management program (BMP) to a telemedicine BMP. The telemedicine BMP consisted of video and/or phone call visits (remote) or a single initial in-person visit followed by remote visits (hybrid). We hypothesized that patient/family satisfaction of a telemedicine BMP would be comparable to an in-person BMP and that there would be improvement in quality of life and functional outcomes after the telemedicine BMP. METHODS: After IRB approval, demographic and outcomes data were obtained for patients who underwent the telemedicine BMP from May-October 2020. Outcomes included a parent/patient satisfaction survey, Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), and parent/patient-reported outcome measures (Vancouver, Baylor, and Cleveland scores) at baseline, 1 and 3 month follow-up. Variables were compared using Chi-square or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests and a generalized mixed model was used to evaluate outcomes scores at follow-up compared to baseline. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were included in our analysis with an average age of 8.6 years (SD: 3.9). Patients had the following diagnoses anorectal malformation (52.2%), Hirschsprung's disease (20.9%), functional constipation (19.4%), myelomeningocele (6.0%), and spinal injury (1.5%). Forty-eight patients (72%) underwent the remote BMP and 19 (28%) underwent the hybrid BMP. Sixty-two percent of parents completed the satisfaction survey, with a median score of 5 (very satisfied) for all questions. Over 75% of parents said they would prefer a telemedicine program over an in-person program. There was significant improvement in the Baylor and Vancouver scores after the BMP (p < 0.01), but no difference in the PedsQL or Cleveland scores (p > 0.05). There was a significant improvement in stool continence after the BMP (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: A telemedicine BMP can be an acceptable alternative to a traditional in-person program. There was high parental/patient satisfaction and significant improvement in outcomes. Further research is needed to assess long-term outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.